تخطٍ إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

نتائج سنتين من التجارب الميدانية لإدارة الملوحة في بساتين الفستق

بحوثبقلم م. حسين نوري9 دقيقة قراءة

مقارنة ثلاث استراتيجيات للغسيل وإصلاح التربة على أربع قطع تجريبية؛ أيها كان مجدياً اقتصادياً؟

Between 2023 and 2025 we compared three salinity management strategies across four trial plots in a pistachio orchard with saturated-extract electrical conductivity between 6 and 8 dS/m. The aim was to find a strategy that both lowers root-zone salinity and is defensible in terms of water use.

Trial design

  1. Control plot: the grower's existing management, unchanged.
  2. Plot A: a single heavy winter leaching event.
  3. Plot B: leaching split across four applications through the season.
  4. Plot C: split leaching combined with granulated gypsum applied at the start of the period.

Main findings

Despite high water use, Plot A produced no durable reduction in salinity; conductivity returned to baseline by mid-season. Plot B performed better, but without structural remediation infiltration remained the limiting factor.

Plot C gave the best outcome: root-zone conductivity down to about 4.2 dS/m by the end of year two, using less water than Plot A. The reason is straightforward — by displacing sodium, gypsum improved infiltration and made leaching more effective.

The economics

The cost of granulated gypsum in Plot C was significant in year one, but counting water saved and the yield gain in year two, payback worked out at under two seasons. In Plot A the extra water, with no durable result, was effectively a net cost.

On sodic soils, leaching without structural remediation looks less like salinity management and more like wasting water.
Trial closing report

Limitations

The trial ran at a single site on one cultivar, so generalising the results warrants caution. Irrigation water quality also varied over the period; this is accounted for in the analysis but its effect cannot be fully isolated.

ملوحة التربةالغسيلالفستقجبس زراعي
العودة إلى كل المقالات